Ia te uita ce mi-a lasat mie mosu’ avocat sub brad. Cel mai amuzant cadou primit pana acum… ori e o gluma foarte buna, ori e un gand foarte prost.
“Dear Sir or Madam:
It has come to our attention that your video clip posted on YT as “Teo@Cafe Deko – Tigani, manele si Hrusca” contains tags that are infringing on our client’s Trademark and Intellectual Property Rights.
The unauthorized use of our client’s name/trademark constitutes copyright infringement under the Copyright Act of 1976, as amended, and any similar applicable statutes.
Under the circumstances, on behalf of our client, we must demand that you immediately take all measures available to cease and desist from using the “HRUSCA” tag in your YouTube postings.
If you fail to take such actions as demanded herein to discontinue the illegal use of our copyright materials, we may, without further notice to you, take such legal action as we deem advisable to assert our statutory and common law rights to prevent such infringement and to recover profits, damages, and costs thereof. Further, nothing herein shall be construed as a waiver or limitation of any of our rights.
This is an amiable notification, we will submit a formal complaint to YouTube authorities on Dec. 27, should you choose not to comply with our request.
All inquiries or further correspondence may be directed to the undersigned.
Sincerely,
Michael M. Stein Solicitor,
Specialist Copyright Litigation
5075 Yonge St.
North York ON M2N 6C6″
17 responses so far ↓
dragostearo // December 24, 2007 at 1:33 pm |
Îi prejudiezi afacerea cu ler.
Ştef // December 24, 2007 at 1:40 pm |
trademarkul Hruşcă =)) Şi n-am început încă colinda… O să am grijă ce se cântă, să nu vină după noi
)
Andi Stancu // December 24, 2007 at 2:12 pm |
Si le-ai schimbat pana la urma ?
ihtys // December 24, 2007 at 10:29 pm |
le-o schimbat…de frica
casargoz // December 25, 2007 at 7:36 am |
Hrusca nu are copyright pe ceea ce canta conform Copyright Act of 1976
(a) The subject matter of copyright as specified by section 102 includes compilations and derivative works, but protection for a work employing preexisting material in which copyright subsists does not extend to any part of the work in which such material has been used unlawfully.
(b) The copyright in a compilation or derivative work extends only to the material contributed by the author of such work, as distinguished from the preexisting material employed in the work, and does not imply any exclusive right in the preexisting material. The copyright in such work is independent of, and does not affect or enlarge the scope, duration, ownership, or subsistence of, any copyright protection in the preexisting material.
§ 110. Limitations on exclusive rights: Exemption of certain performances and displays43
(3) performance of a nondramatic literary or musical work or of a dramatico-musical work of a religious nature, or display of a work, in the course of services at a place of worship or other religious assembly;
==================================================================
A “derivative work” is a work based upon one or more preexisting works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted. A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a “derivative work”.
=========
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative_work
=================
Scopul actului mentionat este:
The Act defines “works of authorship” as any of the following:
1. literary works,
2. musical works, including any accompanying words,
3. dramatic works, including any accompanying music,
4. pantomimes and choreographic works,
5. pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works,
6. motion pictures and other audiovisual works, and
7. sound recordings.[2]
An eighth category, architectural works, was added in 1990.
=========================
In nici un caz nu este in scopul acestui act utilizarea exclusiva a unei etichete si hartuirea diverselor persoane pentru utilizarea acestei etichete.
Chestia asta cu tag-ul Hrusca cred ca este un abuz.
Iar ceea cew canta Hrusca este de domeniu public conform aceluiasi act.
Acoustiq / eXiGe // December 25, 2007 at 4:17 pm |
Wow. Si eu credeam ca Hrusca are simtul umorului.
Anyway, dupa cum ziceam acu’ ceva vreme, devii un mic Lenny
Should I call you Lenny from now on? 
Or is that copyright infringement as well? =))
bloguluteo // December 26, 2007 at 3:10 pm |
@casargoz
multam de informatii, foarte folositoare.
@Acoustiq
bre, sincer, zi-mi cum vrei da’ de procese, demente si supradoze nu am nici un chef, ca de-abia ce m-am trezit
Icey // December 26, 2007 at 10:33 pm |
Imi plac glumele tale, unele din ele, nu toate, dar trebuie sa dau glas unei observatii. Daca ai vazut setul lui Bernie Mac de la Original Kings of Comedy…e o faza acolo in care explica el cuvantul motherfucker…care mie unul mi s-a parut foarte similara cu partea ta intitulata “Cuvinte vulgare”. So, cred ca un tag legat de hrusca e nimica toata:-??
krossfire // December 27, 2007 at 5:01 pm |
Deci Hrusca flegmeaza acelasi lucru pe piata muzicala, de 10 ani. Nu ca ar conta, dar dupa ce esti obisnuit sa scoti albume ca ”Iarasi Colinde” e imposibil ca lumea sa nu spuna la fiecare album de colinde iesit ‘Inca un Hrusca’. Deci da, Hrusca e un trademark popular si nu inteleg de ce nu are omul propriul lui canal de YouTube unde cele 12 colinde pe care sa le stie sa fie prezente in 100 de videoclipuri live cu diverse variatii. Asa nu ii vei mai putea intina ”trademarkul”.
Sea // December 27, 2007 at 8:40 pm |
Welcome back!
Si sa n-avem vorbe la proces!!
Cadou Pentru Mine? « TIR // December 28, 2007 at 11:04 pm |
[...] Cadou Pentru Mine? Cadou? Pentru mine?! [...]
neuronu // January 1, 2008 at 10:55 am |
La Multi Ani, Teo! Fie ca cel mai bun an de pana acum sa inceapa chiar de azi!Sa ti se implineasca tot ce ti-ai propus pe 2008 (cu conditia sa nu ma afecteze pe mine
)
Di Lee // January 1, 2008 at 11:05 pm |
legal action my ass… hai la multi ani:) sa ne fericesti si anul asta
Tomelu' // January 3, 2008 at 8:54 am |
Ai nevoie de avocat? Hai sa facem nishte banutzi cinstitzi… pe legea noastra
bobo // January 6, 2008 at 12:11 pm |
se pare ca se pune la cale un complot si din patea narcisei suciu ,fuego si carmen serban care vor sa organizeze un marsh de protest impotriva ta pe ruta unirii-universitate-romana-new york….asa ca vezi ce faci coae!!!
Mare ti-e gradina… « BloguLuTeo // January 10, 2008 at 1:12 pm |
[...] Diverse , Egoism pur , Stand-up comedy , Umor involuntar , Vazand viata Dupa cum scriam aici, s-au suparat avocatii lui Hrusca pe mine si au urlat ca am incalcat copyrightu’ vampirului [...]
Marius B // January 15, 2008 at 7:31 am |
“This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Stefan Hrusca International Inc.”
Astia chiar vbesc serios? =))